TEMUX vs. GMAQX
TEMUX (Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and GMAQX (GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, TEMUX returned 23.38%/yr vs 34.59%/yr for GMAQX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEMUX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for GMAQX.
Performance
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMUX achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 56.75% return.
TEMUX
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 6M
- 29.34%
- 1Y
- 53.74%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
GMAQX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 14.67%
- YTD
- 56.75%
- 6M
- 62.50%
- 1Y
- 90.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMUX Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 26.66% | 34.68% | 5.47% | 9.87% | -21.75% | -5.29% |
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 56.75% | 32.09% | 0.62% | 27.41% | -32.38% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMUX and GMAQX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TEMUX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMUX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMUX
GMAQX
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMUX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.92 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 6.72 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.54 | 25.88 | -7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMUX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 4.44 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.79 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMUX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, which is greater than GMAQX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMUX and GMAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMUX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.20% | -41.97% | -26.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -13.77% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.86% | -19.64% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.77% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.84% | -16.73% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.57% | -0.29% |
Volatility
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (TEMUX) is 7.36%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that TEMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMUX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 12.63% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 18.56% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 20.83% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 17.21% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 17.21% | +0.54% |
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMUX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMUX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison
TEMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than GMAQX's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 6.02% | 9.43% | 32.28% | 6.76% | 4.94% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEMUX Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.92% | 2.43% | 2.09% | 2.41% | 1.92% | 4.47% | 1.96% | 1.81% | 1.67% | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMUX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMAQX has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to TEMUX (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMUX dropped -68.20% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.
GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.44 vs 3.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEMUX and GMAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer