PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEMT vs. TSLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMT achieves a -35.84% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 17.46% return.


TEMT

1D
11.14%
1M
27.18%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-46.30%
1Y
-60.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLQ

1D
0.09%
1M
26.81%
YTD
17.46%
6M
36.29%
1Y
-53.58%
3Y*
-64.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TEMT
Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF
-35.84%-49.34%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
17.46%-67.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMT and TSLQ is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEMT vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMT
TEMT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TEMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEMTTSLQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.93

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.74

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-0.95

-0.06

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMT and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMT drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMT and TSLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEMTTSLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.10%

-98.73%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.10%

-72.21%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.24%

-98.25%

+17.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.59%

-67.67%

+17.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.18%

56.50%

+3.68%

Volatility

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) has a higher volatility of 51.87% compared to Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) at 27.08%. This indicates that TEMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEMTTSLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

51.87%

27.08%

+24.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.08%

56.64%

+37.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.25%

87.75%

+42.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

137.06%

94.23%

+42.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.06%

94.23%

+42.83%

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEMT vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

TEMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.37%, more than TSLQ's 8.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TEMT
Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF
52.37%33.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
8.99%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEMT and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEMT has higher volatility (51.87%) compared to TSLQ (27.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMT dropped -87.10% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

On 1-year performance, TSLQ leads with -53.58% vs -60.64% for TEMT. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, TSLQ has been the lower-risk option at 27.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -53.58% return vs -60.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for TEMT.

TEMT has the higher dividend yield at 52.37%, compared with 8.99% for TSLQ.

TEMT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for TEMT and 1.17% for TSLQ.

TEMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEMT and TSLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer