TEMT vs. BWET
TEMT (Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. TEMT is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, TEMT returned -55.30% vs 1898.00% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. TEMT charges 1.30%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
TEMT vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMT achieves a -40.84% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,090.11% return.
TEMT
- 1D
- -13.16%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- -55.76%
- YTD
- -40.84%
- 1Y
- -55.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 17.22%
- 6M
- 619.17%
- YTD
- 1,090.11%
- 1Y
- 1,898.00%
- 3Y*
- 125.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEMT vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | -40.84% | -49.34% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 1,090.11% | 61.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMT and BWET is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMT vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
TEMT
BWET
TEMT vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMT | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.89 | -0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 46.63 | -47.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 176.08 | -176.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMT vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMT drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMT and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMT | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.10% | -56.90% | -30.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.10% | -41.22% | -45.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.70% | -10.91% | -71.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -23.65% | -28.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.44% | 10.89% | +51.55% |
Volatility
TEMT vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) is 41.48%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 48.58%. This indicates that TEMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMT | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.48% | 48.58% | -7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.29% | 96.67% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.64% | 107.50% | +24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 137.08% | 74.64% | +62.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.08% | 74.64% | +62.44% |
TEMT vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMT vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
TEMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.80%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | 56.80% | 33.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMT and BWET have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (48.58%) compared to TEMT (41.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMT dropped -87.10% vs BWET's -56.90%.
On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1898.00% vs -55.30% for TEMT. On fees, TEMT is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, TEMT has been the lower-risk option at 41.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1898.00% return vs -55.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEMT is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
TEMT has the higher dividend yield at 56.80%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
TEMT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for TEMT and 3.50% for BWET.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.89 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEMT and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer