TEL vs. GD
TEL (TE Connectivity Ltd.) and GD (General Dynamics Corporation) are both stocks. Over the past 10 years, TEL returned 14.89%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for GD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEL vs. GD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEL achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than GD's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TEL has outperformed GD with an annualized return of 14.89%, while GD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.59% annualized return.
TEL
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -11.51%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
GD
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
TEL vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd. | -9.00% | 61.60% | 3.51% | 24.62% | -27.66% | 35.12% | 28.95% | 29.37% | -18.87% | 39.88% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 2.13% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEL and GD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TEL and GD has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TEL:
$60.65B
GD:
$93.43B
TEL:
$9.78
GD:
$15.92
TEL:
21.01
GD:
21.41
TEL:
3.89
GD:
2.71
TEL:
3.30
GD:
1.73
TEL:
4.58
GD:
3.58
TEL:
$18.52B
GD:
$53.81B
TEL:
$6.55B
GD:
$7.48B
TEL:
$4.47B
GD:
$6.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEL vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank
TEL
GD
TEL vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEL | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.77 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 6.11 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEL | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.22 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.72 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.51 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.57 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
TEL vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEL drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than GD's maximum drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEL and GD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEL | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -75.67% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -14.53% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -22.55% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.26% | -22.55% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -51.63% | +3.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.66% | -6.79% | -9.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -15.61% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 4.19% | +4.89% |
Volatility
TEL vs. GD - Volatility Comparison
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 5.72%. This indicates that TEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEL | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 5.72% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | 17.14% | +10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 21.02% | +12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.02% | 20.40% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 22.71% | +5.64% |
Dividends
TEL vs. GD - Dividend Comparison
TEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than GD's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.79% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd. | 1.42% | 1.22% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.90% | 1.23% | 1.57% | 1.90% | 2.27% | 1.65% | 2.08% | 1.98% |
Financials
TEL vs. GD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TE Connectivity Ltd. and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEL vs. GD - Profitability Comparison
TEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
GD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.
TEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
GD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
TEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
GD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEL and GD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEL has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to GD (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEL dropped -81.07% vs GD's -75.67%.
GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEL and GD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer