TEL vs. CME
TEL (TE Connectivity Ltd.) and CME (CME Group Inc.) are both stocks. TEL operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while CME operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TEL returned 14.89%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for CME. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEL vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEL achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than CME's -5.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEL having a 14.89% annualized return and CME not far behind at 14.50%.
TEL
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -11.51%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
CME
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -5.50%
- 6M
- -4.13%
- 1Y
- -4.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
TEL vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd. | -9.00% | 61.60% | 3.51% | 24.62% | -27.66% | 35.12% | 28.95% | 29.37% | -18.87% | 39.88% |
CME CME Group Inc. | -5.50% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEL and CME is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007 | 0.32 |
The correlation between TEL and CME shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TEL:
$60.65B
CME:
$91.54B
TEL:
$9.78
CME:
$11.75
TEL:
21.01
CME:
21.45
TEL:
3.89
CME:
1.87
TEL:
3.30
CME:
13.46
TEL:
4.58
CME:
3.44
TEL:
$18.52B
CME:
$6.76B
TEL:
$6.55B
CME:
$5.84B
TEL:
$4.47B
CME:
$5.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEL vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
TEL
CME
TEL vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEL | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.98 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.21 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | -0.72 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEL | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | -0.23 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.59 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TEL vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEL drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEL and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEL | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -77.50% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -21.42% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -21.42% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.26% | -31.74% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.71% | -37.36% | -10.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.66% | -20.95% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -20.69% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 6.35% | +2.73% |
Volatility
TEL vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) is 9.59%, while CME Group Inc. (CME) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that TEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEL | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 10.21% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | 16.89% | +10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 20.38% | +13.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.02% | 20.06% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 23.89% | +4.46% |
Dividends
TEL vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
TEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than CME's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.44% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
TEL TE Connectivity Ltd. | 1.42% | 1.22% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.90% | 1.23% | 1.57% | 1.90% | 2.27% | 1.65% | 2.08% | 1.98% |
Financials
TEL vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TE Connectivity Ltd. and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TEL vs. CME - Profitability Comparison
TEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
TEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
TEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TEL and CME have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CME has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to TEL (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEL dropped -81.07% vs CME's -77.50%.
TEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEL and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer