TEKY vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TEKY (Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEKY is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TEKY returned 37.15% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TEKY charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

TEKY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEKY achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

TEKY

• 1D: -4.74%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 6M: 18.90%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEKY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEKY Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF	20.06%	50.31%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TEKY and BAMU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

TEKY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEKY

TEKY Risk / Return Rank: 40
TEKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TEKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TEKY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TEKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TEKY Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEKY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEKY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	4.94	-3.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	8.71	-6.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	2.41	-1.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	24.37	-22.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	96.52	-91.77

TEKY vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEKY Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEKY and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEKY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEKY drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEKY and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEKY	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.43%	-0.36%	-21.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.43%	-0.12%	-21.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	0.00%	-5.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-0.02%	-4.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.83%	0.03%	+7.80%

Volatility

TEKY vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY) has a higher volatility of 12.26% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that TEKY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEKY	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.26%	0.09%	+12.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.10%	0.39%	+20.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.37%	0.58%	+24.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.80%	0.87%	+25.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.80%	0.87%	+25.93%

TEKY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEKY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEKY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

TEKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
TEKY Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF	0.17%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEKY and BAMU in my portfolio?

TEKY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEKY or BAMU?

TEKY has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEKY dropped -21.43% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, TEKY or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, TEKY leads with 37.15% vs 2.87% for BAMU. On fees, TEKY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEKY or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, TEKY has performed better with a 37.15% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEKY or BAMU?

TEKY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEKY or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.17% for TEKY.

What is the main difference between TEKY and BAMU?

TEKY is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TEKY and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.