PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEK vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEK vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 39.87% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.


TEK

1D
-1.99%
1M
13.74%
YTD
39.87%
6M
37.87%
1Y
61.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KROP

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
16.59%
6M
14.86%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
0.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEK vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TEK
iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF
39.87%18.63%2.35%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
16.59%7.95%-5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TEK and KROP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024

0.20

TEK vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEK
KROP

Technology

85.2%

-

Communication Services

6.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
0.3%

Industrials

2.8%
39.7%

Basic Materials

0.9%
32.1%

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

26.3%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TEK
85.2%
KROP

-

Communication Services

TEK
6.0%
KROP

-

Consumer Cyclical

TEK
3.9%
KROP
0.3%

Industrials

TEK
2.8%
KROP
39.7%

Basic Materials

TEK
0.9%
KROP
32.1%

Financial Services

TEK
0.4%
KROP

-

Consumer Defensive

TEK

-

KROP
26.3%

Energy

TEK

-

KROP

-

Healthcare

TEK

-

KROP
0.3%

Real Estate

TEK

-

KROP

-

Utilities

TEK

-

KROP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEK vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEK
TEK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEK Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEK vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEKKROPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.14

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

2.58

+6.70

TEK vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEK Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEK and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEKKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.81

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

-0.57

+1.91

Drawdowns

TEK vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and KROP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEKKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-61.96%

+33.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.29%

-11.29%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-48.93%

+46.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-44.50%

+38.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

4.99%

+1.63%

Volatility

TEK vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that TEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEKKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

4.69%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.28%

11.98%

+9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.71%

16.04%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

22.27%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

22.27%

+6.93%

TEK vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEK vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.34%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%
TEK
iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF
1.16%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEK and KROP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEK has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEK dropped -28.24% vs KROP's -61.96%.

On 1-year performance, TEK leads with 61.28% vs 12.86% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEK has performed better with a 61.28% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.16% for TEK.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.50% for KROP.

TEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEK and KROP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer