TEK vs. CRTC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TEK (iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TEK is actively managed, while CRTC is passively managed. Over the past year, TEK returned 30.40% vs 14.54% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

TEK vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEK achieves a 21.44% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 6.95% return.

TEK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -7.12%
• 6M: 19.04%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 1Y: 30.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.70%

CRTC

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• 6M: 4.69%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	$258.18K	$628.52K	$497.75K
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	$171.97K	$226.82K	$208.52K

TEK vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	21.44%	18.63%	2.63%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	6.95%	18.69%	-1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TEK and CRTC is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024	0.83

The correlation between TEK and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TEK vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEK	CRTC
Technology	85.8%	39.6%
Industrials	5.3%	13.4%
Communication Services	5.2%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	4.9%
Basic Materials	0.8%	3.0%
Financial Services	0.3%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	5.8%
Healthcare	-	13.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

TEK vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEK

TEK Risk / Return Rank: 35
TEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TEK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TEK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 37
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEK vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEK	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	0.92	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.16	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.42	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	4.45	-0.92

TEK vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEK Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEK and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEK vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEK drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEK and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEK	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-19.07%	-9.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.55%	-9.05%	-13.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.72%	-2.76%	-12.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-2.23%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	2.88%	+4.94%

Volatility

TEK vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.66%. This indicates that TEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEK	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.74%	3.66%	+11.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.28%	10.80%	+18.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.18%	13.91%	+19.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.24%	15.77%	+16.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.24%	15.77%	+16.47%

TEK vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEK vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than CRTC's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.89%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF	1.31%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEK and CRTC in my portfolio?

TEK and CRTC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEK or CRTC?

TEK has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to CRTC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEK dropped -28.24% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, TEK or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, TEK leads with 30.40% vs 14.54% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEK or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, TEK has performed better with a 30.40% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEK or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEK or CRTC?

TEK has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.89% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between TEK and CRTC?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TEK and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.