PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TEGB.L is traded in GBP, while LDEG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDEG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEGB.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


TEGB.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.33%
YTD
6.39%
6M
8.88%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.94%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TEGB.L
VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF
6.39%27.36%6.93%17.13%-6.85%6.89%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TEGB.L and LDEG.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.72

The correlation between TEGB.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEGB.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

35.8%
41.5%

Industrials

23.8%
15.8%

Technology

10.8%
2.0%

Healthcare

10.4%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
9.9%

Communication Services

2.8%
5.2%

Utilities

2.0%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
3.1%

Energy

1.1%
7.7%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

TEGB.L
35.8%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Industrials

TEGB.L
23.8%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Technology

TEGB.L
10.8%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Healthcare

TEGB.L
10.4%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TEGB.L
9.4%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Basic Materials

TEGB.L
3.2%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Communication Services

TEGB.L
2.8%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Utilities

TEGB.L
2.0%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

TEGB.L
1.3%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Energy

TEGB.L
1.1%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Real Estate

TEGB.L
0.9%
LDEG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEGB.L
TEGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TEGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEGB.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.78

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

13.82

-7.62

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEGB.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEGB.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.63

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.24

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.24

-0.56

Drawdowns

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEGB.L drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEGB.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEGB.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-15.97%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-8.04%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-12.05%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-15.97%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.33%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-2.95%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.20%

+0.89%

Volatility

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEGB.L) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that TEGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEGB.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.57%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

9.21%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

11.55%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

15.99%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

16.01%

+0.99%

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEGB.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

TEGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than LDEG.L's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%0.00%0.00%
TEGB.L
VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF
2.69%2.41%2.78%2.65%2.85%2.52%2.38%3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEGB.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEGB.L.

TEGB.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEGB.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEGB.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer