TEFQX vs. FDTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX).
TEFQX is managed by Firsthand Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999. FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013.
Performance
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEFQX Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund | -15.04% | 29.82% | -22.02% | 10.81% | -60.11% | -16.48% | 97.04% | 28.50% | 4.31% | 55.45% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -10.89% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEFQX achieves a -15.04% return, which is significantly lower than FDTRX's -10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, TEFQX has underperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 3.92%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.37% annualized return.
TEFQX
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- -15.04%
- 6M
- -20.68%
- 1Y
- 14.52%
- 3Y*
- -5.01%
- 5Y*
- -20.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
FDTRX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -11.59%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEFQX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEFQX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank
TEFQX
FDTRX
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEFQX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 0.80 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.31 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.83 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 2.70 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEFQX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.80 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.24 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.67 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.66 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEFQX and FDTRX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison
TEFQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEFQX Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% | 54.72% | 6.88% | 15.27% | 5.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.74% | 0.00% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 11.66% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEFQX drawdown since its inception was -92.33%, which is greater than FDTRX's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEFQX and FDTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEFQX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.33% | -48.10% | -44.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -20.39% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.25% | -48.10% | -31.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.17% | -48.10% | -32.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.68% | -16.37% | -57.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.08% | -9.22% | -50.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.04% | 6.25% | +4.79% |
Volatility
TEFQX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison
Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) has a higher volatility of 11.87% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) at 9.28%. This indicates that TEFQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEFQX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.87% | 9.28% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.60% | 16.81% | +7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.62% | 26.47% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.89% | 26.27% | +47.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.22% | 24.53% | +30.69% |