PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Telefonica (TEF.MC) and Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEF.MC achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than CLNX.MC's 3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TEF.MC has underperformed CLNX.MC with an annualized return of -2.94%, while CLNX.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.29% annualized return.


TEF.MC

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.00%
YTD
12.02%
6M
10.31%
1Y
-11.69%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
-2.94%

CLNX.MC

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
3.46%
6M
11.29%
1Y
-16.74%
3Y*
-9.15%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEF.MC
Telefonica
12.02%-5.79%18.10%11.17%-6.72%27.46%-43.82%-11.15%-5.78%-4.57%
CLNX.MC
Cellnex Telecom SA
3.46%-10.05%-14.27%15.52%-39.49%12.63%37.48%94.87%5.35%56.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TEF.MC and CLNX.MC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2015

0.27

The correlation between TEF.MC and CLNX.MC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (10 years) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEF.MC
TEF.MC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TEF.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEF.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEF.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TEF.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEF.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CLNX.MC
CLNX.MC Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CLNX.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Telefonica (TEF.MC) and Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEF.MCCLNX.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.90

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

-0.61

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-1.03

+0.44

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEF.MC Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the CLNX.MC Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEF.MC and CLNX.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEF.MCCLNX.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

-0.65

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.38

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.36

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.30

-0.08

Drawdowns

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEF.MC drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, which is greater than CLNX.MC's maximum drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEF.MC and CLNX.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEF.MCCLNX.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.98%

-58.93%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.46%

-26.87%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-34.84%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.23%

-58.93%

+24.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.15%

-58.93%

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.07%

-53.25%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-22.09%

-14.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.07%

15.99%

+2.08%

Volatility

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Volatility Comparison

Telefonica (TEF.MC) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) at 6.73%. This indicates that TEF.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLNX.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEF.MCCLNX.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

6.73%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

20.73%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

25.31%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

27.91%

-6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.55%

28.12%

-2.57%

Dividends

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Dividend Comparison

TEF.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than CLNX.MC's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLNX.MC
Cellnex Telecom SA
1.39%0.06%0.21%0.16%0.17%0.13%0.13%0.20%0.47%0.33%0.54%0.19%
TEF.MC
Telefonica
6.21%6.96%6.17%6.88%7.13%7.28%9.66%5.20%4.41%3.99%6.80%5.84%

Financials

TEF.MC vs. CLNX.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Telefonica and Cellnex Telecom SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TEF.MC and CLNX.MC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEF.MC and CLNX.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer