PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) and Verallia (VRLA.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLNX.MC achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than VRLA.PA's -8.48% return.


CLNX.MC

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
3.46%
6M
11.29%
1Y
-16.74%
3Y*
-9.15%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
10.29%

VRLA.PA

1D
1.42%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-8.48%
6M
-12.73%
1Y
-25.26%
3Y*
-10.91%
5Y*
-4.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CLNX.MC
Cellnex Telecom SA
3.46%-10.05%-14.27%15.52%-39.49%12.63%37.48%8.06%
VRLA.PA
Verallia
-8.48%0.45%-26.18%14.45%6.78%9.92%-0.79%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CLNX.MC and VRLA.PA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLNX.MC
CLNX.MC Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CLNX.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLNX.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VRLA.PA
VRLA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VRLA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRLA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRLA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VRLA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRLA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) and Verallia (VRLA.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLNX.MCVRLA.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.84

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.54

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-1.08

+0.04

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLNX.MC Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is comparable to the VRLA.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLNX.MC and VRLA.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLNX.MCVRLA.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

-0.91

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

-0.14

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.01

+0.31

Drawdowns

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNX.MC drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VRLA.PA drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNX.MC and VRLA.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNX.MCVRLA.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.93%

-60.59%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.87%

-46.31%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.84%

-60.59%

+25.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.93%

-60.59%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.25%

-46.76%

-6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.09%

-22.29%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.99%

23.20%

-7.21%

Volatility

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Volatility Comparison

Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) and Verallia (VRLA.PA) have volatilities of 6.73% and 6.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLNX.MCVRLA.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

6.94%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

22.94%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.31%

27.44%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

30.28%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.12%

33.08%

-4.96%

Dividends

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Dividend Comparison

CLNX.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than VRLA.PA's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLNX.MC
Cellnex Telecom SA
1.39%0.06%0.21%0.16%0.17%0.13%0.13%0.20%0.47%0.33%0.54%0.19%
VRLA.PA
Verallia
5.00%7.40%8.86%4.02%3.31%3.07%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CLNX.MC vs. VRLA.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cellnex Telecom SA and Verallia. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLNX.MC and VRLA.PA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLNX.MC and VRLA.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer