PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEET.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TEET.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TEET.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEET.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TEET.L has outperformed TDGB.L with an annualized return of 11.68%, while TDGB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.


TEET.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
-1.05%
6M
4.97%
YTD
6.60%
1Y
17.45%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
11.68%

TDGB.L

1D
0.57%
1M
1.85%
6M
9.77%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
17.71%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEET.L
VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
6.60%36.69%5.24%23.87%-16.69%17.73%5.97%39.97%-9.19%10.18%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
11.13%40.77%8.81%14.79%9.40%18.51%-2.72%8.05%-13.18%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TEET.L and TDGB.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.74

The correlation between TEET.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEET.L
TEET.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TEET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TEET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TEET.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEET.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.48

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

5.79

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

15.45

-10.63

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEET.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEET.L drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEET.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEET.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-45.20%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-5.06%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-13.68%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.03%

-18.93%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.34%

-45.20%

+7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

0.00%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-8.11%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

1.90%

+1.49%

Volatility

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TEET.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 3.08%. This indicates that TEET.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEET.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

3.08%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.79%

8.46%

+6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

11.09%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.75%

14.19%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

16.10%

+3.01%

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEET.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEET.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

TEET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than TDGB.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.15%3.50%4.26%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%4.38%3.48%
TEET.L
VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
2.68%2.41%2.84%2.58%2.92%2.60%2.20%3.69%4.29%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEET.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDGB.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDGB.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEET.L.

TEET.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. TEET.L tracks VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEET.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEET.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer