TEET.L vs. MOAT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

TEET.L (VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEET.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF, while MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TEET.L returned 11.68%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for MOAT.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEET.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOAT.L.

Performance

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TEET.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEET.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TEET.L has outperformed MOAT.L with an annualized return of 11.68%, while MOAT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.71% annualized return.

TEET.L

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 4.97%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 1Y: 17.45%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: 11.68%

MOAT.L

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 2.59%
• 6M: -1.76%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 1Y: 8.33%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: 10.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEET.L VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF	6.60%	36.69%	5.24%	23.87%	-16.69%	17.73%	5.97%	39.97%	-9.19%	10.18%
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	0.19%	7.34%	11.12%	18.37%	-18.70%	25.53%	13.62%	33.78%	-1.64%	22.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TEET.L and MOAT.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2015	0.70

The correlation between TEET.L and MOAT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEET.L

TEET.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
TEET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TEET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
TEET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
TEET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TEET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MOAT.L

MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TEET.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEET.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	0.59	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	0.98	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.11	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	0.70	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	1.75	+3.06

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEET.L and MOAT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEET.L drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEET.L and MOAT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEET.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.34%	-32.78%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.35%	-11.86%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.53%	-21.84%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.03%	-27.06%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.34%	-32.78%	-4.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	-2.24%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.20%	-5.55%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	4.74%	-1.35%

Volatility

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TEET.L) is 4.76%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that TEET.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEET.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	5.05%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	10.69%	+4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	14.07%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	16.47%	+2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.11%	16.84%	+2.27%

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEET.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEET.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison

TEET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while MOAT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TEET.L VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF	2.68%	2.41%	2.84%	2.58%	2.92%	2.60%	2.20%	3.69%	4.29%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEET.L and MOAT.L in my portfolio?

TEET.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEET.L or MOAT.L?

On fees, TEET.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEET.L or MOAT.L?

TEET.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.

What is the main difference between TEET.L and MOAT.L?

TEET.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. TEET.L tracks VanEck European Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEET.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.