PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEDMX vs. EMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEDMX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDMX achieves a 43.38% return, which is significantly higher than EMO's 16.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 13.50%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.75% annualized return.


TEDMX

1D
-0.91%
1M
14.19%
YTD
43.38%
6M
47.35%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
32.80%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.50%

EMO

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
16.39%
6M
15.04%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
32.55%
5Y*
26.25%
10Y*
6.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEDMX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
43.38%44.71%8.14%12.28%-22.17%-5.82%18.65%26.39%-16.21%40.21%
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
16.39%7.38%44.45%31.76%40.13%74.70%-64.47%19.60%-25.73%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDMX and EMO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011

0.34

The correlation between TEDMX and EMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEDMX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

EMO
EMO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEDMX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEDMXEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.25

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

2.08

+3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.22

4.59

+18.64

TEDMX vs. EMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.16, which is higher than the EMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDMX and EMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEDMXEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16

1.36

+2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.99

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.16

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.11

+0.32

Drawdowns

TEDMX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDMX drawdown since its inception was -64.97%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDMX and EMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEDMXEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.97%

-95.06%

+30.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-10.87%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-18.81%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.15%

-28.59%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-93.02%

+48.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-6.17%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-31.96%

+12.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

4.92%

-1.30%

Volatility

TEDMX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) at 6.26%. This indicates that TEDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEDMXEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

6.26%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.62%

12.24%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.30%

16.61%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

26.72%

-7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

41.24%

-22.13%

TEDMX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDMX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEDMX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison

TEDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than EMO's 8.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
8.57%9.41%7.16%6.79%6.71%6.71%15.82%10.94%16.39%10.85%9.76%11.88%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
1.84%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEDMX and EMO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEDMX has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to EMO (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDMX dropped -64.97% vs EMO's -95.06%.

TEDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEDMX and EMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer