TECY vs. LQTI
TECY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TECY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
TECY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TECY
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF | -2.36% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECY and LQTI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
TECY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
TECY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF (TECY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TECY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TECY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECY drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -3.41% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -0.57% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -0.89% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
TECY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 5.11% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 5.92% | +9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 5.92% | +9.11% |
TECY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TECY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
TECY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, less than LQTI's 9.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.03% | 7.01% |
TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF | 8.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TECY.
LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.03%, compared with 8.19% for TECY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TECY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for TECY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer