TECW.L vs. VHVG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TECW.L (SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF) and VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - TECW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TECW.L returned 29.52%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for VHVG.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TECW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVG.L.

Performance

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECW.L achieves a 24.30% return, which is significantly higher than VHVG.L's 11.81% return.

TECW.L

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 15.12%
• YTD: 24.30%
• 6M: 22.78%
• 1Y: 52.52%
• 3Y*: 29.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VHVG.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.27%
• 1Y: 29.87%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TECW.L SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF	24.30%	13.84%	36.32%	46.35%	-17.74%
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc	11.81%	13.85%	19.99%	17.54%	-6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TECW.L and VHVG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.83

The correlation between TECW.L and VHVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECW.L

TECW.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
TECW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TECW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TECW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TECW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
TECW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

VHVG.L

VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TECW.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.90	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.99	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.55	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	4.29	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.04	17.65	-9.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECW.L and VHVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TECW.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.90	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.89	+0.13

Drawdowns

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, which is greater than VHVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECW.L and VHVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TECW.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.26%	-25.41%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.66%	-6.94%	-9.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.26%	-17.96%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	-0.36%	-1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-3.28%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.52%	1.69%	+4.83%

Volatility

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (TECW.L) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that TECW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TECW.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	2.72%	+4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	7.53%	+6.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	10.27%	+9.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.01%	12.97%	+9.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.01%	15.06%	+6.95%

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

TECW.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TECW.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TECW.L and VHVG.L in my portfolio?

TECW.L and VHVG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TECW.L or VHVG.L?

On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TECW.L or VHVG.L?

VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TECW.L.

What is the main difference between TECW.L and VHVG.L?

TECW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. TECW.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TECW.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.