TECS vs. MUU
TECS (Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - TECS tracks the Technology Select Sector Index (-300%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. TECS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
TECS vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TECS
- 1D
- 11.54%
- 1M
- -13.82%
- YTD
- -60.06%
- 6M
- -58.34%
- 1Y
- -76.73%
- 3Y*
- -62.98%
- 5Y*
- -57.09%
- 10Y*
- -62.40%
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECS vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TECS Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares | 9.76% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECS and MUU is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECS vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
TECS
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TECS vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares (TECS) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TECS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TECS vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECS and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -26.28% | -73.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -26.28% | -73.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.76% | -10.19% | -86.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.87% | — | — |
Volatility
TECS vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.17% | 295.32% | -225.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.65% | 295.32% | -219.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.84% | 295.32% | -222.48% |
TECS vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TECS vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
TECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECS Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares | 9.75% | 5.83% | 5.24% | 7.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 2.40% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECS and MUU have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TECS.
TECS has the higher dividend yield at 9.75%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
TECS tracks Technology Select Sector Index (-300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for TECS and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for TECS and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer