TECL vs. FAS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - TECL tracks the Technology Select Sector Index (300%) while FAS tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TECL returned 47.77%/yr vs 22.12%/yr for FAS. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TECL charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FAS.

Performance

TECL vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECL achieves a 77.71% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TECL has outperformed FAS with an annualized return of 47.77%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively lower 22.12% annualized return.

TECL

• 1D: 14.98%
• 1M: 6.72%
• 6M: 88.27%
• YTD: 77.71%
• 1Y: 117.04%
• 3Y*: 64.24%
• 5Y*: 28.73%
• 10Y*: 47.77%
• ALL TIME*: 48.13%

FAS

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: 11.29%
• 6M: 18.93%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 1Y: 23.10%
• 3Y*: 43.11%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 22.12%
• ALL TIME*: 14.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	$71.58M	$81.12M	$86.51M
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares	$156.89M	$152.83M	$226.69M

TECL vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares	77.71%	38.60%	36.15%	203.14%	-74.32%	112.80%	69.46%	185.58%	-24.03%	124.82%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	9.27%	21.48%	84.47%	14.92%	-43.19%	116.59%	-34.97%	113.04%	-33.84%	67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TECL and FAS is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between TECL and FAS has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TECL vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TECL	FAS
Technology	99.2%	1.6%
Communication Services	0.8%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TECL vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TECL

TECL Risk / Return Rank: 54
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 22
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TECL vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TECL	FAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.53	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	0.98	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.12	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	0.57	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	1.26	+4.71

TECL vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECL Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECL and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TECL vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECL drawdown since its inception was -77.96%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECL and FAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TECL	FAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.96%	-91.61%	+13.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.58%	-40.88%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.58%	-43.10%	-23.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.96%	-66.88%	-11.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.96%	-85.99%	+8.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.68%	0.00%	-23.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.45%	-30.96%	+12.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.69%	18.39%	+1.30%

Volatility

TECL vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a higher volatility of 30.57% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) at 11.40%. This indicates that TECL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TECL	FAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.57%	11.40%	+19.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.53%	32.92%	+33.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.41%	43.53%	+33.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.96%	55.00%	+21.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.75%	61.12%	+12.63%

TECL vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECL has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

TECL vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than FAS's 7.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	7.68%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares	4.01%	7.19%	0.29%	0.28%	0.22%	0.32%	0.52%	0.25%	0.47%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TECL and FAS in my portfolio?

TECL and FAS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TECL or FAS?

TECL has higher volatility (30.57%) compared to FAS (11.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECL dropped -77.96% vs FAS's -91.61%.

Which ETF is better, TECL or FAS?

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 47.77% vs 22.12% for FAS. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 11.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TECL or FAS?

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 47.77% return vs 22.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TECL or FAS?

FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for TECL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TECL or FAS?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 4.01% for TECL.

What is the main difference between TECL and FAS?

TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%), while FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for TECL and 0.88% for FAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.