TECI.TO vs. ORBX
TECI.TO (TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF) and ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TECI.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Technology Innovators Index (CA NTR), while ORBX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Space Tech Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TECI.TO is traded in CAD, while ORBX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ORBX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
TECI.TO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 16.61%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 6M
- 43.71%
- 1Y
- 75.88%
- 3Y*
- 36.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORBX
- 1D
- -6.93%
- 1M
- 25.97%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF | 27.71% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 23.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECI.TO and ORBX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECI.TO vs. ORBX — Risk / Return Rank
TECI.TO
ORBX
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF (TECI.TO) and Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TECI.TO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TECI.TO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 4.83 | -4.41 |
Drawdowns
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECI.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, which is greater than ORBX's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECI.TO and ORBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECI.TO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.94% | -18.22% | -36.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.22% | +18.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -5.08% | -17.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECI.TO | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.91% | 78.81% | -53.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 78.81% | -49.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 78.81% | -49.39% |
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TECI.TO and ORBX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
TECI.TO vs. ORBX - Dividend Comparison
TECI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECI.TO TD Global Technology Innovators Index ETF | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECI.TO and ORBX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TECI.TO and ORBX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TECI.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while ORBX is Aerospace & Defense. TECI.TO tracks Solactive Global Technology Innovators Index (CA NTR), while ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Global X.
Find the right allocation for TECI.TO and ORBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer