PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECB vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TECB vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TECB having a 19.78% return and XT slightly higher at 20.20%.


TECB

1D
-0.89%
1M
12.64%
YTD
19.78%
6M
18.27%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*

XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECB vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TECB
iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF
19.78%14.86%24.38%57.53%-34.39%19.60%39.90%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%32.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TECB and XT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2020

0.89

The correlation between TECB and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

TECB vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TECB
XT

Technology

63.2%
43.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
23.4%

Communication Services

11.1%
5.2%

Financial Services

5.7%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
7.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.0%

Industrials

1.0%
10.1%

Energy

0.7%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

TECB
63.2%
XT
43.5%

Healthcare

TECB
11.1%
XT
23.4%

Communication Services

TECB
11.1%
XT
5.2%

Financial Services

TECB
5.7%
XT
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TECB
5.4%
XT
7.9%

Real Estate

TECB
1.8%
XT
0.0%

Industrials

TECB
1.0%
XT
10.1%

Energy

TECB
0.7%
XT
0.3%

Basic Materials

TECB

-

XT
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

TECB

-

XT
0.0%

Utilities

TECB

-

XT
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECB vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECB
TECB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TECB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TECB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECB vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECBXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

4.41

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

18.51

-12.27

TECB vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECB Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECB and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECBXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.89

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.41

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.66

+0.08

Drawdowns

TECB vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECB drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECB and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECBXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-34.41%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-10.45%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-22.09%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-34.41%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-0.47%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-7.41%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

2.49%

+3.04%

Volatility

TECB vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that TECB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECBXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

4.85%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

11.94%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

15.99%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

20.76%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

20.08%

+5.29%

TECB vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

TECB vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

TECB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TECB
iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF
0.28%0.33%0.35%0.23%0.61%0.35%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TECB and XT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECB has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECB dropped -41.62% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 5-year performance, TECB leads with 14.60% vs 8.42% for XT. On fees, TECB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TECB has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.28% for TECB.

TECB tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TECB and 0.46% for XT.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECB and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer