TEC vs. IDGT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TEC (Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TEC is actively managed, while IDGT is passively managed. Over the past year, TEC returned 27.03% vs 37.85% for IDGT. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IDGT.

Performance

TEC vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEC achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 33.42% return.

TEC

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 14.71%
• YTD: 12.93%
• 1Y: 27.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.08%

IDGT

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 29.48%
• YTD: 33.42%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 19.74%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 12.69%
• ALL TIME*: 4.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	$4.39M	$4.34M	$8.08M
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	$6.58K	$8.72K	$15.46K

TEC vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	12.93%	44.21%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	33.42%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TEC and IDGT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025	0.69

The correlation between TEC and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

TEC vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEC	IDGT
Technology	72.0%	58.1%
Communication Services	11.3%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	-
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Industrials	2.3%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	41.9%

Return for Risk

TEC vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEC

TEC Risk / Return Rank: 39
TEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TEC Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TEC Martin Ratio Rank: 37

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 63
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEC vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEC	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.58	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.16	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.27	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	2.09	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	6.91	-2.99

TEC vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEC and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEC vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC and IDGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEC	IDGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-77.95%	+60.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-16.93%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.37%	-14.67%	+7.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-19.85%	+16.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	5.11%	+1.05%

Volatility

TEC vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.14%. This indicates that TEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEC	IDGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	7.14%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.75%	18.73%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	22.44%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.53%	23.48%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.53%	23.34%	-0.81%

TEC vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEC vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

TEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.80%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%
TEC Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEC and IDGT in my portfolio?

TEC and IDGT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEC or IDGT?

TEC has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to IDGT (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEC dropped -17.50% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

Which ETF is better, TEC or IDGT?

On 1-year performance, IDGT leads with 37.85% vs 27.03% for TEC. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEC or IDGT?

Over the 1-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 27.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEC or IDGT?

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEC or IDGT?

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for TEC.

What is the main difference between TEC and IDGT?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TEC and 0.39% for IDGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.