PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEBRX vs. IMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEBRX achieves a 23.20% return, which is significantly higher than IMSIX's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX has outperformed IMSIX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while IMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.


TEBRX

1D
0.97%
1M
-2.69%
6M
18.04%
YTD
23.20%
1Y
36.95%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
14.61%
10Y*
14.67%
ALL TIME*
8.37%

IMSIX

1D
1.03%
1M
-0.50%
6M
1.04%
YTD
2.55%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
1.44%
ALL TIME*
1.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
23.20%18.67%20.76%34.92%-22.47%25.02%20.61%26.55%-6.70%15.25%
IMSIX
IMS Strategic Income Fund
2.55%8.83%0.41%10.14%-17.29%11.84%4.01%15.97%-9.31%-5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TEBRX and IMSIX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between TEBRX and IMSIX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEBRX vs. IMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEBRX
TEBRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TEBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TEBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IMSIX
IMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEBRXIMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

1.15

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

3.56

+8.79

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the IMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEBRX and IMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEBRX drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, smaller than the maximum IMSIX drawdown of -51.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEBRX and IMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEBRXIMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.10%

-51.80%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-4.93%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-7.88%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-25.83%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.22%

-26.09%

-6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-22.70%

+15.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-20.85%

+15.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.59%

+1.52%

Volatility

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to IMS Strategic Income Fund (IMSIX) at 1.87%. This indicates that TEBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEBRXIMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

1.87%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

4.64%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.79%

6.33%

+13.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

8.83%

+11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

9.20%

+9.92%

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEBRX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IMSIX's 1.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEBRX vs. IMSIX - Dividend Comparison

TEBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than IMSIX's 8.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMSIX
IMS Strategic Income Fund
8.12%7.96%7.00%5.16%7.84%6.79%5.93%5.02%6.38%7.27%9.32%11.40%
TEBRX
Teberg Fund
0.10%0.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.60%0.77%0.92%0.00%10.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEBRX and IMSIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEBRX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to IMSIX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEBRX dropped -39.10% vs IMSIX's -51.80%.

TEBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEBRX and IMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer