TEBRX vs. FLDFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TEBRX (Teberg Fund) and FLDFX (Meeder Balanced Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX returned 15.20%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for FLDFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEBRX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for FLDFX.

Performance

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEBRX achieves a 29.59% return, which is significantly higher than FLDFX's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX has outperformed FLDFX with an annualized return of 15.20%, while FLDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.

TEBRX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 11.04%
• YTD: 29.59%
• 6M: 28.81%
• 1Y: 51.91%
• 3Y*: 28.45%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

FLDFX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 20.05%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: 9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEBRX Teberg Fund	29.59%	18.67%	20.76%	34.92%	-22.47%	25.02%	20.61%	26.55%	-6.70%	15.25%
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund	8.14%	12.35%	26.72%	12.08%	-11.07%	13.22%	5.27%	12.29%	-3.25%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TEBRX and FLDFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006	0.82

The correlation between TEBRX and FLDFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TEBRX vs. FLDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEBRX

TEBRX Risk / Return Rank: 92
TEBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TEBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
TEBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TEBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TEBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FLDFX

FLDFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FLDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FLDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FLDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEBRX	FLDFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	2.28	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.30	3.24	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.42	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.27	2.83	+2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.39	12.37	+11.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEBRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the FLDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEBRX and FLDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEBRX	FLDFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30	2.28	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.84	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.85	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.53	+0.06

Drawdowns

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEBRX drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, which is greater than FLDFX's maximum drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEBRX and FLDFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEBRX	FLDFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.10%	-36.88%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-7.19%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	-11.47%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.35%	-20.41%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.22%	-20.41%	-11.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.54%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-7.97%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.64%	+0.60%

Volatility

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Volatility Comparison

Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX) at 2.70%. This indicates that TEBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEBRX	FLDFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	2.70%	+3.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	6.99%	+5.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.90%	8.91%	+6.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.99%	11.76%	+8.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	10.60%	+8.16%

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEBRX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDFX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEBRX vs. FLDFX - Dividend Comparison

TEBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FLDFX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDFX Meeder Balanced Fund	3.25%	3.50%	26.22%	1.58%	3.76%	8.15%	0.60%	1.43%	1.41%	6.08%	1.11%	1.26%
TEBRX Teberg Fund	0.09%	0.12%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.47%	0.60%	0.77%	0.92%	0.00%	10.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEBRX and FLDFX in my portfolio?

TEBRX and FLDFX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEBRX or FLDFX?

TEBRX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to FLDFX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEBRX dropped -39.10% vs FLDFX's -36.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.