TEBRX vs. AAMCX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TEBRX (Teberg Fund) and AAMCX (Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds from Absolute Capital. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX returned 14.67%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for AAMCX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TEBRX charges 1.75%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for AAMCX.

Performance

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEBRX achieves a 23.20% return, which is significantly higher than AAMCX's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TEBRX has outperformed AAMCX with an annualized return of 14.67%, while AAMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.

TEBRX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -2.69%
• 6M: 18.04%
• YTD: 23.20%
• 1Y: 36.95%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 14.61%
• 10Y*: 14.67%
• ALL TIME*: 8.37%

AAMCX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 7.54%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: 11.54%
• 5Y*: 4.77%
• 10Y*: 5.29%
• ALL TIME*: 5.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TEBRX Teberg Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEBRX Teberg Fund	23.20%	18.67%	20.76%	34.92%	-22.47%	25.02%	20.61%	26.55%	-6.70%	15.25%
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	9.32%	9.86%	10.16%	12.53%	-19.02%	14.36%	4.78%	9.61%	-6.22%	10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TEBRX and AAMCX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.88

The correlation between TEBRX and AAMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TEBRX vs. AAMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEBRX

TEBRX Risk / Return Rank: 79
TEBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TEBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TEBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TEBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TEBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

AAMCX

AAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 54
AAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
AAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teberg Fund (TEBRX) and Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEBRX	AAMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.52	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.15	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.27	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	2.48	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.35	10.33	+2.02

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the AAMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEBRX and AAMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEBRX drawdown since its inception was -39.10%, which is greater than AAMCX's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEBRX and AAMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEBRX	AAMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.10%	-22.73%	-16.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-6.29%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	-15.42%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.35%	-22.73%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.22%	-22.73%	-9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.34%	-0.08%	-7.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-5.49%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	1.51%	+1.60%

Volatility

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Volatility Comparison

Teberg Fund (TEBRX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) at 3.15%. This indicates that TEBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEBRX	AAMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	3.15%	+3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.91%	8.21%	+8.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	10.33%	+9.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	11.93%	+8.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	11.33%	+7.79%

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEBRX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AAMCX's 2.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEBRX vs. AAMCX - Dividend Comparison

TEBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than AAMCX's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	2.19%	2.40%	3.64%	0.00%	0.00%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	11.86%	3.78%	1.20%	0.00%
TEBRX Teberg Fund	0.10%	0.12%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.47%	0.60%	0.77%	0.92%	0.00%	10.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEBRX and AAMCX in my portfolio?

TEBRX and AAMCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEBRX or AAMCX?

TEBRX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to AAMCX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEBRX dropped -39.10% vs AAMCX's -22.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.