TE.PA vs. SAN.PA
TE.PA (Technip Energies BV) and SAN.PA (Sanofi) are both stocks. TE.PA operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while SAN.PA operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, TE.PA returned 25.39%/yr vs 1.93%/yr for SAN.PA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TE.PA achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than SAN.PA's -2.43% return.
TE.PA
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -10.78%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.76%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SAN.PA
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -7.75%
- 3Y*
- -2.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TE.PA Technip Energies BV | 10.37% | 29.78% | 28.20% | 48.15% | 18.74% | 0.94% |
SAN.PA Sanofi | -2.43% | -7.87% | 8.77% | 3.64% | 5.51% | 17.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TE.PA and SAN.PA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between TE.PA and SAN.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA — Risk / Return Rank
TE.PA
SAN.PA
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Technip Energies BV (TE.PA) and Sanofi (SAN.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TE.PA | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | -0.45 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | -0.79 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TE.PA | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | -0.30 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.08 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TE.PA drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, smaller than the maximum SAN.PA drawdown of -50.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TE.PA and SAN.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TE.PA | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.12% | -50.84% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.35% | -16.18% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.35% | -27.80% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.07% | -27.80% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.91% | -23.13% | +9.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.25% | -14.68% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.70% | 9.03% | +4.67% |
Volatility
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Volatility Comparison
Technip Energies BV (TE.PA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Sanofi (SAN.PA) at 6.23%. This indicates that TE.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAN.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TE.PA | SAN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 6.23% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.66% | 15.24% | +8.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 23.93% | +6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.29% | 22.77% | +12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.53% | 21.36% | +15.17% |
Dividends
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Dividend Comparison
TE.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than SAN.PA's 5.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAN.PA Sanofi | 5.39% | 4.74% | 4.01% | 3.97% | 3.71% | 3.61% | 4.00% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 4.12% | 3.81% | 3.63% |
TE.PA Technip Energies BV | 2.87% | 2.62% | 4.44% | 2.46% | 3.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TE.PA vs. SAN.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Technip Energies BV and Sanofi. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TE.PA and SAN.PA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TE.PA and SAN.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer