TDW vs. XOM
TDW (Tidewater Inc.) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — TDW in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, XOM in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, TDW returned -4.85%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for XOM. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TDW vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDW achieves a 48.60% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 30.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TDW has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of -4.85%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.
TDW
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 11.98%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- YTD
- 48.60%
- 1Y
- 50.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 45.99%
- 10Y*
- -4.85%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.63%
XOM
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 14.06%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 1Y
- 43.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 26.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.43M | $47.11M | $55.89M | |
| $2.16B | $2.15B | $2.46B |
TDW vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDW Tidewater Inc. | 48.60% | -7.68% | -24.13% | 95.69% | 244.07% | 23.96% | -55.14% | 0.78% | -21.60% | -77.81% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 30.91% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDW and XOM is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.44 |
The correlation between TDW and XOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TDW:
$3.73B
XOM:
$644.38B
TDW:
$6.02
XOM:
$5.96
TDW:
12.47
XOM:
26.10
TDW:
0.52
XOM:
1.21
TDW:
2.76
XOM:
2.03
TDW:
2.72
XOM:
2.56
TDW:
$1.35B
XOM:
$326.01B
TDW:
$314.74M
XOM:
$83.11B
TDW:
$489.31M
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDW vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
TDW
XOM
TDW vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidewater Inc. (TDW) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDW | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.18 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 5.53 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDW vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDW drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDW and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDW | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -62.40% | -37.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.10% | -20.11% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.35% | -20.11% | -50.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.35% | -20.51% | -49.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.27% | -61.01% | -36.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.37% | -8.73% | -87.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.15% | -10.22% | -38.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.96% | 7.95% | +6.01% |
Volatility
TDW vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Tidewater Inc. (TDW) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 7.52%. This indicates that TDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDW | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 7.52% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 20.71% | +10.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.11% | 25.02% | +29.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.29% | 26.65% | +26.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.15% | 28.28% | +37.87% |
Dividends
TDW vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
TDW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDW Tidewater Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 14.37% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.62% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
TDW vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tidewater Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TDW vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
TDW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tidewater Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 326.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
TDW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tidewater Inc. reported an operating income of 58.98M and revenue of 326.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
TDW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tidewater Inc. reported a net income of 6.14M and revenue of 326.22M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TDW and XOM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDW has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to XOM (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDW dropped -99.80% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDW and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer