PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDW vs. WEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDW vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidewater Inc. (TDW) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDW achieves a 48.60% return, which is significantly higher than WEAT's 19.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TDW having a -4.85% annualized return and WEAT not far ahead at -4.69%.


TDW

1D
2.15%
1M
11.98%
6M
20.12%
YTD
48.60%
1Y
50.09%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
45.99%
10Y*
-4.85%
ALL TIME*
-0.63%

WEAT

1D
-3.29%
1M
6.29%
6M
13.54%
YTD
19.23%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
-10.44%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
-4.69%
ALL TIME*
-10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.43M$47.11M$55.89M
$15.37M$12.62M$15.36M

TDW vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
48.60%-7.68%-24.13%95.69%244.07%23.96%-55.14%0.78%-21.60%-77.81%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
19.23%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TDW and WEAT is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDW vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDW
TDW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDW vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidewater Inc. (TDW) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDWWEATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

0.66

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

1.67

+1.94

TDW vs. WEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the WEAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDW and WEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDW vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDW drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than WEAT's maximum drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDW and WEAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDWWEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-84.32%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.10%

-14.44%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.35%

-40.21%

-30.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.35%

-67.83%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.27%

-67.83%

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.37%

-81.22%

-15.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-63.30%

+14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.96%

5.77%

+8.19%

Volatility

TDW vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison

Tidewater Inc. (TDW) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) at 8.78%. This indicates that TDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDWWEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

8.78%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.87%

19.79%

+11.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.11%

22.84%

+31.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.29%

30.33%

+22.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.15%

26.84%

+39.31%

Dividends

TDW vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDW nor WEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDW
Tidewater Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%14.37%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDW and WEAT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDW has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to WEAT (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDW dropped -99.80% vs WEAT's -84.32%.

TDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDW and WEAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer