TDTF vs. GBIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX).
TDTF is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. GBIAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Dec 29, 1999.
Performance
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 0.50% | 7.83% | 2.40% | 4.10% | -9.73% | 5.54% | 9.98% | 7.99% | -0.82% | 1.93% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | -0.40% | 6.54% | 0.44% | 5.03% | -14.06% | -2.38% | 6.60% | 8.08% | -0.74% | 2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDTF achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than GBIAX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TDTF has outperformed GBIAX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while GBIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.
TDTF
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
GBIAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDTF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIAX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TDTF vs. GBIAX — Risk / Return Rank
TDTF
GBIAX
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDTF | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.77 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.10 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 3.85 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDTF | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.77 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | -0.10 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.18 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.73 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDTF and GBIAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Dividend Comparison
TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than GBIAX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 3.82% | 4.58% | 3.98% | 3.97% | 7.60% | 4.55% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 2.60% | 2.20% | 1.51% | 0.21% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | 2.97% | 3.18% | 3.07% | 2.57% | 1.59% | 3.02% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, smaller than the maximum GBIAX drawdown of -20.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and GBIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDTF | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -20.26% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.56% | -2.73% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | -19.07% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.02% | -20.26% | +8.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -6.78% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -3.02% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.99% | -0.30% |
Volatility
TDTF vs. GBIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) is 1.15%, while Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that TDTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDTF | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.54% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | 2.62% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 4.36% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 5.98% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 4.94% | +0.14% |