TDTF vs. BCLO
TDTF (FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) and BCLO (iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDTF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS, while BCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE High Quality Mezzanine Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TDTF returned 5.07% vs 6.72% for BCLO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TDTF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BCLO.
Performance
TDTF vs. BCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDTF achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than BCLO's 2.79% return.
TDTF
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
BCLO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDTF vs. BCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.52% | 6.59% |
BCLO iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF | 2.79% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDTF and BCLO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | -0.02 |
The correlation between TDTF and BCLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDTF vs. BCLO — Risk / Return Rank
TDTF
BCLO
TDTF vs. BCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) and iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDTF | BCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.86 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.52 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 13.00 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDTF | BCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 3.33 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.42 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
TDTF vs. BCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDTF drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, which is greater than BCLO's maximum drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTF and BCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDTF | BCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -4.45% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.58% | -1.92% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -0.40% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 0.52% | -0.04% |
Volatility
TDTF vs. BCLO - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO) at 0.48%. This indicates that TDTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDTF | BCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.48% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | 1.65% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 2.03% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 4.39% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 4.39% | +0.68% |
TDTF vs. BCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDTF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BCLO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDTF vs. BCLO - Dividend Comparison
TDTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than BCLO's 6.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCLO iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF | 6.59% | 6.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.71% | 4.58% | 3.98% | 3.97% | 7.60% | 4.55% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 2.60% | 2.20% | 1.51% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDTF and BCLO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDTF has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to BCLO (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTF dropped -12.02% vs BCLO's -4.45%.
On 1-year performance, BCLO leads with 6.72% vs 5.07% for TDTF. On fees, TDTF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BCLO has performed better with a 6.72% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDTF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BCLO.
BCLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 4.71% for TDTF.
TDTF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BCLO is CLO. TDTF tracks iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS, while BCLO tracks JP Morgan CLOIE High Quality Mezzanine Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTF and 0.45% for BCLO.
BCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDTF and BCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer