PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck AEX UCITS ETF (TDT.AS) and iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TDT.AS is traded in EUR, while CHSPI.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the CHSPI.SW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDT.AS achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than CHSPI.SW's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TDT.AS has outperformed CHSPI.SW with an annualized return of 11.70%, while CHSPI.SW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.74% annualized return.


TDT.AS

1D
0.21%
1M
3.97%
YTD
11.73%
6M
11.77%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
11.70%

CHSPI.SW

1D
0.00%
1M
1.19%
YTD
4.20%
6M
7.65%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
9.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDT.AS
VanEck AEX UCITS ETF
11.73%10.57%14.47%16.93%-12.00%30.49%5.32%28.01%-7.60%16.18%
CHSPI.SW
iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH)
5.36%19.23%4.37%12.89%-12.65%29.23%4.22%35.38%-4.82%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TDT.AS and CHSPI.SW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2014

0.66

The correlation between TDT.AS and CHSPI.SW shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDT.AS
TDT.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TDT.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CHSPI.SW
CHSPI.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CHSPI.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSPI.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AEX UCITS ETF (TDT.AS) and iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDT.ASCHSPI.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.21

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

4.13

+1.46

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDT.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the CHSPI.SW Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDT.AS and CHSPI.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDT.ASCHSPI.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.02

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.60

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.68

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.62

-0.02

Drawdowns

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDT.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, which is greater than CHSPI.SW's maximum drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDT.AS and CHSPI.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDT.ASCHSPI.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-26.21%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-10.78%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.87%

-16.01%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.17%

-17.60%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-26.21%

-9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-3.43%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-5.25%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.12%

-0.31%

Volatility

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Volatility Comparison

VanEck AEX UCITS ETF (TDT.AS) and iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH) (CHSPI.SW) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDT.ASCHSPI.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.62%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

10.36%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

12.78%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

13.99%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.48%

+1.74%

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDT.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CHSPI.SW's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDT.AS vs. CHSPI.SW - Dividend Comparison

TDT.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than CHSPI.SW's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHSPI.SW
iShares Core SPI® ETF (CH)
2.89%2.65%2.98%2.94%2.84%2.27%2.59%2.66%3.85%2.71%3.15%2.67%
TDT.AS
VanEck AEX UCITS ETF
2.02%2.28%2.40%2.24%2.32%1.69%1.75%3.24%3.37%3.04%3.28%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDT.AS and CHSPI.SW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHSPI.SW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHSPI.SW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TDT.AS.

TDT.AS tracks Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR, while CHSPI.SW tracks Swiss Performance Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TDT.AS and 0.10% for CHSPI.SW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDT.AS and CHSPI.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer