TDSC vs. TDSA
TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TDSC is actively managed, while TDSA is passively managed. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TDSA.
Performance
TDSC vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDSC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
TDSA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 6.70% |
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% |
TDSC vs. TDSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDSC
TDSA
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
TDSC
TDSA
Healthcare
TDSC
TDSA
Energy
TDSC
TDSA
Utilities
TDSC
TDSA
Communication Services
TDSC
TDSA
Consumer Cyclical
TDSC
TDSA
Financial Services
TDSC
TDSA
Consumer Defensive
TDSC
TDSA
Industrials
TDSC
TDSA
Basic Materials
TDSC
TDSA
Real Estate
TDSC
TDSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSC vs. TDSA — Risk / Return Rank
TDSC
TDSA
TDSC vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSC | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSC | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | — | — |
Drawdowns
TDSC vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and TDSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSC | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.51% | 0.00% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | 0.00% | -9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility
TDSC vs. TDSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSC | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.90% | 0.00% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 0.00% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.22% | 0.00% | +10.22% |
TDSC vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSC vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison
TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.01% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDSA.
TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.83% for TDSA.
Find the right allocation for TDSC and TDSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer