PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSC vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSC vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TDSC

1D
0.55%
1M
3.52%
YTD
11.58%
6M
11.52%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSC vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


TDSC vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDSC
QCON

Technology

28.5%

-

Healthcare

19.9%

-

Energy

17.6%

-

Utilities

15.0%
1.5%

Communication Services

4.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%

-

Financial Services

3.9%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Industrials

2.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TDSC
28.5%
QCON

-

Healthcare

TDSC
19.9%
QCON

-

Energy

TDSC
17.6%
QCON

-

Utilities

TDSC
15.0%
QCON
1.5%

Communication Services

TDSC
4.7%
QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

TDSC
4.3%
QCON

-

Financial Services

TDSC
3.9%
QCON
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

TDSC
3.4%
QCON

-

Industrials

TDSC
2.0%
QCON
1.0%

Basic Materials

TDSC
0.7%
QCON

-

Real Estate

TDSC
0.1%
QCON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSC vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSCQCONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.00

TDSC vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSCQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSCQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

0.00%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

0.00%

-9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

Volatility

TDSC vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSCQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

0.00%

+8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

0.00%

+10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

0.00%

+10.23%

TDSC vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSC vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.00%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.

TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSC and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer