TDSC vs. QCON
TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
TDSC vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDSC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 6.85% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
TDSC vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDSC
QCON
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TDSC
QCON
-
Healthcare
TDSC
QCON
-
Energy
TDSC
QCON
-
Utilities
TDSC
QCON
Communication Services
TDSC
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
TDSC
QCON
-
Financial Services
TDSC
QCON
Consumer Defensive
TDSC
QCON
-
Industrials
TDSC
QCON
Basic Materials
TDSC
QCON
-
Real Estate
TDSC
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSC vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
TDSC
QCON
TDSC vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSC | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSC | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | — | — |
Drawdowns
TDSC vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSC | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.51% | 0.00% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | 0.00% | -9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility
TDSC vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSC | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 0.00% | +8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 0.00% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 0.00% | +10.23% |
TDSC vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSC vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.00% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.
TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for TDSC and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer