TDSA vs. WIMA
TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) and WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds - TDSA tracks the Actively Managed while WIMA tracks the WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index. Both are passively managed. TDSA charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for WIMA.
Performance
TDSA vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDSA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSA vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | -0.12% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSA vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSA | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.12 | — |
Drawdowns
TDSA vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum WIMA drawdown of -2.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSA and WIMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSA | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -2.75% | +2.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.77% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.95% | +0.95% |
Volatility
TDSA vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSA | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 13.54% | -13.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 13.54% | -13.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 13.54% | -13.54% |
TDSA vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSA has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSA vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither TDSA nor WIMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDSA.
TDSA and WIMA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TDSA tracks Actively Managed, while WIMA tracks WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Index. They also come from different issuers: Cabana and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDSA and 0.42% for WIMA.
Find the right allocation for TDSA and WIMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer