TDSA vs. TBFC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) and TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TDSA is passively managed, while TBFC is actively managed. TDSA charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TBFC.

Performance

TDSA vs. TBFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TDSA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFC

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 5.69%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 15.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSA vs. TBFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF	0.00%
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	2.84%

TDSA vs. TBFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDSA	TBFC
Real Estate	35.5%	2.1%
Technology	24.3%	21.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.1%
Industrials	6.7%	12.7%
Healthcare	6.7%	8.9%
Communication Services	6.5%	6.0%
Financial Services	4.7%	18.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	6.3%
Energy	1.6%	7.3%
Basic Materials	1.2%	5.7%
Utilities	1.0%	3.8%

Return for Risk

TDSA vs. TBFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFC

TBFC Risk / Return Rank: 72
TBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSA vs. TBFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDSA	TBFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.51	—

Drawdowns

TDSA vs. TBFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TBFC drawdown of -8.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSA and TBFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDSA	TBFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-8.89%	+8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.31%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-1.06%	+1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TDSA	TBFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	6.35%	-6.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	7.14%	-7.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	7.14%	-7.14%

TDSA vs. TBFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSA has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFC's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDSA vs. TBFC - Dividend Comparison

TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF	2.93%	3.28%	2.98%
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, TDSA or TBFC?

On fees, TBFC is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDSA or TBFC?

TBFC is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDSA or TBFC?

TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.

What is the main difference between TDSA and TBFC?

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Brinsmere. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDSA and 0.44% for TBFC.