PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSA vs. MOOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSA vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TDSA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOOD

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.67%
YTD
14.40%
6M
16.67%
1Y
36.14%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSA vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


TDSA vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDSA
MOOD

Real Estate

35.5%
2.5%

Technology

24.3%
27.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.5%

Industrials

6.7%
12.6%

Healthcare

6.7%
8.4%

Communication Services

6.5%
7.9%

Financial Services

4.7%
15.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
5.1%

Energy

1.6%
3.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
4.4%

Utilities

1.0%
2.7%

Real Estate

TDSA
35.5%
MOOD
2.5%

Technology

TDSA
24.3%
MOOD
27.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TDSA
8.6%
MOOD
9.5%

Industrials

TDSA
6.7%
MOOD
12.6%

Healthcare

TDSA
6.7%
MOOD
8.4%

Communication Services

TDSA
6.5%
MOOD
7.9%

Financial Services

TDSA
4.7%
MOOD
15.7%

Consumer Defensive

TDSA
3.1%
MOOD
5.1%

Energy

TDSA
1.6%
MOOD
3.7%

Basic Materials

TDSA
1.2%
MOOD
4.4%

Utilities

TDSA
1.0%
MOOD
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSA vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSA

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSA vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDSA vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSAMOODDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

Drawdowns

TDSA vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MOOD drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSA and MOOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSAMOODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-14.34%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.61%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.32%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

Volatility

TDSA vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSAMOODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

14.11%

-14.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.07%

-12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

12.07%

-12.07%

TDSA vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSA has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSA vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.35%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%
TDSA
Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOOD is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDSA.

MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDSA and 0.68% for MOOD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSA and MOOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer