TDOT vs. BTCZ
TDOT (21Shares Polkadot ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. TDOT is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. TDOT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDOT
- 1D
- -11.66%
- 1M
- -28.35%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 10.70%
- 1M
- 77.17%
- YTD
- 54.87%
- 6M
- 58.86%
- 1Y
- 67.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDOT 21Shares Polkadot ETF | -36.65% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 17.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDOT and BTCZ is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | -0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDOT vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
TDOT
BTCZ
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDOT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.30 | -0.53 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDOT drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOT and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDOT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -91.06% | +49.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.58% | -75.02% | +33.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -73.73% | +55.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.77% | — |
Volatility
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDOT | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.20% | 88.13% | -21.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.20% | 97.32% | -31.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.20% | 97.32% | -31.12% |
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDOT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDOT vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
TDOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
TDOT 21Shares Polkadot ETF | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDOT and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDOT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDOT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
TDOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TDOT and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for TDOT and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer