PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDOT vs. BTCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TDOT

1D
-11.66%
1M
-28.35%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCZ

1D
10.70%
1M
77.17%
YTD
54.87%
6M
58.86%
1Y
67.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDOT and BTCZ is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026

-0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDOT vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDOT

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Polkadot ETF (TDOT) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDOTBTCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.30

-0.53

-0.77

Drawdowns

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDOT drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOT and BTCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDOTBTCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-91.06%

+49.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.58%

-75.02%

+33.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-73.73%

+55.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.77%

Volatility

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDOTBTCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.20%

88.13%

-21.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.20%

97.32%

-31.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.20%

97.32%

-31.12%

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDOT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDOT vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

TDOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
TDOT
21Shares Polkadot ETF
0.80%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDOT and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDOT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDOT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

TDOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TDOT and 0.95% for BTCZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDOT and BTCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer