PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDOG vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDOG vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Dogecoin ETF (TDOG) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TDOG

1D
-2.41%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBLC

1D
-3.00%
1M
13.52%
YTD
32.34%
6M
15.25%
1Y
73.27%
3Y*
48.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDOG vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDOG and IBLC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDOG vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDOG

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDOG vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Dogecoin ETF (TDOG) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDOG vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDOGIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.85

0.40

-1.25

Drawdowns

TDOG vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDOG drawdown since its inception was -29.24%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOG and IBLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDOGIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.24%

-62.54%

+33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.22%

-12.99%

-14.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-25.89%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.56%

Volatility

TDOG vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDOGIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.14%

54.94%

+12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.14%

64.49%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.14%

64.49%

+2.65%

TDOG vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDOG vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

TDOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
4.77%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%
TDOG
21Shares Dogecoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDOG and IBLC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDOG.

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for TDOG.

TDOG tracks Dogecoin (DOGE), while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDOG and 0.47% for IBLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDOG and IBLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer