TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO
TDOC.TO (TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF) and LONG.TO (CI Global Longevity Economy Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDOC.TO returned 5.10%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for LONG.TO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDOC.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than LONG.TO's 7.98% return.
TDOC.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
LONG.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- —
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDOC.TO TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF | 0.57% | 8.36% | 10.24% | 1.71% | -1.37% | 15.59% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 7.98% | 6.19% | 25.86% | 19.50% | -9.01% | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDOC.TO and LONG.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between TDOC.TO and LONG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TDOC.TO
LONG.TO
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC.TO) and CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDOC.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 4.55 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDOC.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.52%, smaller than the maximum LONG.TO drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOC.TO and LONG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDOC.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.52% | -23.65% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -16.39% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.66% | -22.45% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.52% | -23.65% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -2.87% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -5.64% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 4.61% | +0.33% |
Volatility
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC.TO) is 5.09%, while CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that TDOC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDOC.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 7.03% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 14.80% | -4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 17.62% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 17.56% | -4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 17.80% | -4.87% |
Dividends
TDOC.TO vs. LONG.TO - Dividend Comparison
TDOC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while LONG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDOC.TO TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF | 1.19% | 1.09% | 3.68% | 0.98% | 1.16% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDOC.TO and LONG.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: TD and CI.
Find the right allocation for TDOC.TO and LONG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer