PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 20.48% return, which is significantly higher than UDVD.L's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed UDVD.L with an annualized return of 18.41%, while UDVD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.80% annualized return.


TDIV

1D
-1.40%
1M
2.98%
YTD
20.48%
6M
16.19%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
29.65%
5Y*
17.29%
10Y*
18.41%

UDVD.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.99%
YTD
7.37%
6M
8.92%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
20.48%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.37%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.05%0.77%22.65%-3.94%15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and UDVD.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between TDIV and UDVD.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDIV
UDVD.L

Technology

85.0%
8.9%

Communication Services

13.4%
3.5%

Industrials

1.6%
17.5%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

17.0%

Energy

-

4.5%

Financial Services

-

11.5%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

14.8%

Technology

TDIV
85.0%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Communication Services

TDIV
13.4%
UDVD.L
3.5%

Industrials

TDIV
1.6%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Basic Materials

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
17.0%

Energy

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
4.5%

Financial Services

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
11.5%

Healthcare

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
6.2%

Real Estate

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
4.6%

Utilities

TDIV

-

UDVD.L
14.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDIVUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.85

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

4.67

+6.29

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDIVUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.32

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.41

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.56

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.72

+0.12

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIVUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-36.12%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-7.06%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-15.26%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-15.26%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-36.12%

+4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.39%

-3.27%

-6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-3.43%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

2.80%

+0.78%

Volatility

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIVUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

2.62%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.37%

7.00%

+8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

9.93%

+9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

13.93%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

15.70%

+5.25%

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than UDVD.L's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.21%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UDVD.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UDVD.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while UDVD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer