TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L
TDIV.AS (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) and IBTS.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV.AS is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while IBTS.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.AS returned 12.48%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for IBTS.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDIV.AS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTS.L.
Performance
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TDIV.AS is traded in EUR, while IBTS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIV.AS achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than IBTS.L's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.AS has outperformed IBTS.L with an annualized return of 12.48%, while IBTS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.
TDIV.AS
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
IBTS.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 1.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.40%
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV.AS VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 11.72% | 24.39% | 15.90% | 11.75% | 15.40% | 27.83% | -10.16% | 20.97% | -7.12% | 2.88% |
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 1.86% | -7.03% | 10.89% | 0.68% | 2.06% | 7.18% | -5.75% | 6.75% | 5.90% | -12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV.AS and IBTS.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016 | 0.02 |
The correlation between TDIV.AS and IBTS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (5 years) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L — Risk / Return Rank
TDIV.AS
IBTS.L
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDIV.AS | IBTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.10 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 0.91 | +6.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.20 | 2.16 | +20.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, which is greater than IBTS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.AS and IBTS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDIV.AS | IBTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -25.99% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.51% | -3.49% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -10.85% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.88% | -12.74% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.10% | -16.79% | -19.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -6.66% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -9.34% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.47% | -0.25% |
Volatility
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) at 1.29%. This indicates that TDIV.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDIV.AS | IBTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 1.29% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.74% | 4.16% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 5.81% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 7.68% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 7.75% | +6.95% |
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTS.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDIV.AS vs. IBTS.L - Dividend Comparison
TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than IBTS.L's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTS.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF | 3.99% | 4.22% | 4.12% | 3.08% | 0.75% | 0.61% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 1.49% | 1.01% | 0.67% | 0.49% |
TDIV.AS VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.14% | 3.58% | 4.19% | 4.98% | 4.58% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 4.93% | 3.95% | 1.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDIV.AS and IBTS.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.AS.
TDIV.AS is categorized as Global Equity Income, while IBTS.L is Government Bonds. TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDIV.AS and 0.07% for IBTS.L.
Find the right allocation for TDIV.AS and IBTS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer