PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TDIV.AS (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) and EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV.AS is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while EUNZ.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.AS returned 12.02%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for EUNZ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDIV.AS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EUNZ.DE.

Performance

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV.AS achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than EUNZ.DE's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.AS has outperformed EUNZ.DE with an annualized return of 12.02%, while EUNZ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.20% annualized return.

TDIV.AS

1D
0.25%
1M
0.39%
YTD
9.89%
6M
12.84%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
12.02%

EUNZ.DE

1D
-1.19%
1M
5.16%
YTD
18.69%
6M
18.37%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
6.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF		9.89%24.40%15.98%10.91%16.18%27.85%-10.17%20.97%-7.12%2.88%
EUNZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		18.69%-0.15%15.73%3.85%-8.85%13.05%-2.49%10.59%-1.89%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV.AS and EUNZ.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between TDIV.AS and EUNZ.DE has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

Often compared with TDIV.AS:
TDIV.AS vs. VHYL.ASTDIV.AS vs. SCHDTDIV.AS vs. JGPI.DETDIV.AS vs. FUSD.LTDIV.AS vs. VUSA.MITDIV.AS vs. FGQD.LTDIV.AS vs. QYLE.DE
Often compared with EUNZ.DE:
EUNZ.DE vs. IBCK.DEEUNZ.DE vs. CNDX.LEUNZ.DE vs. IQQ0.DEEUNZ.DE vs. IS3S.DEEUNZ.DE vs. ACUG.DEEUNZ.DE vs. 36B5.DEEUNZ.DE vs. GLD

Return for Risk

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE
EUNZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EUNZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TDIV.ASEUNZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.79
1.85

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.99
2.65

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.35

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.19

3.00

+4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.93

10.57

+9.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the EUNZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV.AS and EUNZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TDIV.ASEUNZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

1.85

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.43

0.56

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.46

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.35

+0.49

Drawdowns

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than EUNZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.AS and EUNZ.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TDIV.ASEUNZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-30.47%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-7.50%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-14.00%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-14.00%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-26.15%

-9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-1.96%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-7.62%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

2.13%

-0.87%

Volatility

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) is 2.38%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that TDIV.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TDIV.ASEUNZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

4.75%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

10.35%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

12.18%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

11.41%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

13.32%

+0.99%

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDIV.AS vs. EUNZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while EUNZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EUNZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF		3.19%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

TDIV.AS and EUNZ.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDIV.AS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDIV.AS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.

TDIV.AS is categorized as Global Equity Income, while EUNZ.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDIV.AS and 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV.AS and EUNZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer