PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TDGB.L is traded in GBP, while LYYA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYYA.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDGB.L achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than LYYA.DE's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TDGB.L has underperformed LYYA.DE with an annualized return of 10.61%, while LYYA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


TDGB.L

1D
0.29%
1M
2.00%
YTD
10.34%
6M
11.70%
1Y
29.39%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
17.98%
10Y*
10.61%

LYYA.DE

1D
1.66%
1M
1.67%
YTD
8.76%
6M
9.47%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
10.34%30.90%10.66%9.04%22.49%19.59%-5.61%3.88%-7.98%2.87%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
8.76%13.49%20.53%17.83%-8.94%23.45%11.45%24.31%-3.72%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TDGB.L and LYYA.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between TDGB.L and LYYA.DE has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LYYA.DE
LYYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDGB.LLYYA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.43

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

3.84

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.78

15.04

+5.74

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDGB.L and LYYA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, smaller than the maximum LYYA.DE drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDGB.L and LYYA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDGB.LLYYA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.94%

-39.15%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

-6.54%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.42%

-19.70%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.42%

-19.70%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.94%

-26.51%

-6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.27%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-5.25%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.67%

-0.26%

Volatility

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) is 2.06%, while Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that TDGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYYA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDGB.LLYYA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

3.15%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

7.94%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

10.90%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.44%

13.75%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

14.89%

-1.13%

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDGB.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LYYA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDGB.L vs. LYYA.DE - Dividend Comparison

TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than LYYA.DE's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
1.14%1.26%1.63%1.35%1.95%1.31%1.58%1.49%2.36%2.05%2.33%2.55%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.16%3.50%4.26%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%4.38%3.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDGB.L and LYYA.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYYA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYYA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while LYYA.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDGB.L and 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDGB.L and LYYA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer