PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDG vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDG vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 27.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TDG has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 21.76%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.66% annualized return.


TDG

1D
-1.59%
1M
-3.24%
6M
-12.06%
YTD
-8.61%
1Y
-17.52%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*
21.76%

XLK

1D
1.29%
1M
-0.52%
6M
25.66%
YTD
27.85%
1Y
44.41%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
24.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDG vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
-8.61%12.15%32.27%66.57%1.77%2.82%10.51%84.41%23.83%19.84%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
27.85%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TDG and XLK is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between TDG and XLK has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDG vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDG
TDG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDG vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDGXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.31

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

2.80

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

8.44

-9.59

TDG vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDG Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDG and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDG vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDGXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.64%

-82.05%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.30%

-15.92%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.30%

-25.66%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-33.56%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

-33.56%

-29.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.86%

-7.25%

-12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-34.84%

+26.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.27%

5.27%

+10.00%

Volatility

TDG vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is 8.02%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that TDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDGXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

10.45%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.73%

20.77%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

24.41%

+4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.06%

25.56%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

24.79%

+9.10%

Dividends

TDG vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
7.41%6.77%5.92%3.46%2.94%0.00%0.00%11.16%0.00%8.01%9.64%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.43%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDG and XLK have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to TDG (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs XLK's -82.05%.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDG and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer