TDG vs. XLK
TDG (TransDigm Group Incorporated) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, TDG returned 21.76%/yr vs 24.66%/yr for XLK. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TDG vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 27.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TDG has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 21.76%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.66% annualized return.
TDG
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- YTD
- -8.61%
- 1Y
- -17.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 21.76%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 25.66%
- YTD
- 27.85%
- 1Y
- 44.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.63%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 24.66%
TDG vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | -8.61% | 12.15% | 32.27% | 66.57% | 1.77% | 2.82% | 10.51% | 84.41% | 23.83% | 19.84% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 27.85% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDG and XLK is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TDG and XLK has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDG vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
TDG
XLK
TDG vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 2.80 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 8.44 | -9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDG vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.64% | -82.05% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.30% | -15.92% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | -25.66% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | -33.56% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -33.56% | -29.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -7.25% | -12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -34.84% | +26.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.27% | 5.27% | +10.00% |
Volatility
TDG vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is 8.02%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that TDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDG | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 10.45% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.73% | 20.77% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.04% | 24.41% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 25.56% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.89% | 24.79% | +9.10% |
Dividends
TDG vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.16% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 9.64% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDG and XLK have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to TDG (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDG and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer