PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDG vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TDG vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TDG has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 22.15%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.67% annualized return.


TDG

1D
-2.62%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
-9.29%
6M
-10.46%
1Y
-12.05%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
22.15%

HLT

1D
-0.72%
1M
7.58%
YTD
18.69%
6M
26.36%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
34.37%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
48.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDG vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
-9.29%12.15%32.27%66.57%1.77%2.82%10.51%84.41%23.83%19.84%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
18.69%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TDG and HLT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.49

The correlation between TDG and HLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TDG:

$70.21B

HLT:

$79.03B

EPS

TDG:

$34.79

HLT:

$6.50

PE Ratio

TDG:

34.67

HLT:

52.41

PEG Ratio

TDG:

1.03

HLT:

0.85

PS Ratio

TDG:

7.38

HLT:

6.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

TDG:

$9.50B

HLT:

$12.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TDG:

$5.61B

HLT:

$5.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

TDG:

$4.78B

HLT:

$3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDG vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDG
TDG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDG vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDGHLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.27

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

3.42

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

7.93

-8.76

TDG vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDG Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDG and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDGHLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

1.52

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.27

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.23

+0.61

Drawdowns

TDG vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and HLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDGHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.64%

-50.82%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.30%

-10.29%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.30%

-26.35%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-32.65%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

-50.82%

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.46%

-0.72%

-19.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-9.73%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.58%

4.43%

+10.15%

Volatility

TDG vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.93%. This indicates that TDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDGHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

6.93%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.00%

17.33%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.63%

23.12%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.81%

27.07%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

181.03%

-147.25%

Dividends

TDG vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than HLT's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
7.46%6.77%5.92%3.46%2.94%0.00%0.00%11.16%0.00%8.01%9.64%0.00%

Financials

TDG vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransDigm Group Incorporated and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.54B
2.94B
(TDG) Total Revenue
(HLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TDG vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TransDigm Group Incorporated and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
59.4%
40.3%
Portfolio components
TDG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

TDG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

TDG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TDG and HLT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDG has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to HLT (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs HLT's -50.82%.

HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDG and HLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer