PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDF vs. FRIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDF vs. FRIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDF achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly lower than FRIAX's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TDF has underperformed FRIAX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while FRIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.29% annualized return.


TDF

1D
0.37%
1M
0.09%
6M
-7.54%
YTD
-2.36%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
-6.93%
10Y*
4.30%
ALL TIME*
8.31%

FRIAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.79%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$630.12K$648.32K$744.32K

TDF vs. FRIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund Inc.
-2.36%37.70%5.44%-20.06%-32.93%-18.02%52.98%27.97%-11.80%42.09%
FRIAX
Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class
5.78%12.02%7.29%8.84%-5.36%17.51%3.72%16.02%-5.23%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TDF and FRIAX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

0.40

The correlation between TDF and FRIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDF vs. FRIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDF
TDF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIAX
FRIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FRIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDF vs. FRIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDFFRIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.52

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.85

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

14.58

-13.08

TDF vs. FRIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDF Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FRIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDF and FRIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDF vs. FRIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDF drawdown since its inception was -68.15%, which is greater than FRIAX's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDF and FRIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDFFRIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.15%

-43.23%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-3.06%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.44%

-7.08%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.24%

-13.63%

-44.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.87%

-24.10%

-42.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.99%

0.00%

-46.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.69%

-3.90%

-18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

0.81%

+5.48%

Volatility

TDF vs. FRIAX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX) at 1.51%. This indicates that TDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDFFRIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

1.51%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.83%

3.74%

+10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

5.03%

+13.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.94%

7.91%

+19.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

9.20%

+14.80%

Dividends

TDF vs. FRIAX - Dividend Comparison

TDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than FRIAX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIAX
Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class
5.28%5.75%5.74%5.67%5.24%6.70%5.37%5.25%5.80%5.20%4.92%5.93%
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund Inc.
4.19%3.55%1.36%0.00%12.73%14.13%24.72%10.75%12.43%7.95%10.34%22.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDF and FRIAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDF has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to FRIAX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDF dropped -68.15% vs FRIAX's -43.23%.

FRIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDF and FRIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer