PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDEC vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDEC vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


TDEC

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.54%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.08%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
9.14%21.39%-0.70%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and GSG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024

-0.05

The correlation between TDEC and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDEC vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDECGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

5.47

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

14.39

-1.32

TDEC vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDECGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.26

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

-0.09

+1.89

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDECGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-89.62%

+79.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-9.46%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-56.95%

+56.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-63.71%

+62.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.59%

-1.74%

Volatility

TDEC vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is 2.81%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that TDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDECGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

7.65%

-4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

20.42%

-11.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

22.95%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

22.61%

-10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.75%

22.03%

-10.28%

TDEC vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDEC vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDEC nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TDEC and GSG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to TDEC (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 51.52% vs 24.15% for TDEC. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 51.52% return vs 24.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

TDEC and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GSG is Commodities. TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TDEC and 0.75% for GSG.

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDEC and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer