PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDEC vs. BUFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDEC vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than BUFD's 5.24% return.


TDEC

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.78%
6M
10.67%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFD

1D
0.15%
1M
1.54%
YTD
5.24%
6M
5.73%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
8.78%21.39%-0.70%
BUFD
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
5.24%10.66%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and BUFD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024

0.62

The correlation between TDEC and BUFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDEC vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFD
BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDECBUFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.59

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.28

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

23.32

-11.08

TDEC vs. BUFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the BUFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and BUFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDECBUFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.83

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

1.00

+0.77

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFD drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and BUFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDECBUFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-10.75%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-3.43%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.97%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.63%

+1.22%

Volatility

TDEC vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) at 0.76%. This indicates that TDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDECBUFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

0.76%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

3.94%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

5.19%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

7.72%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

7.54%

+4.19%

TDEC vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TDEC and BUFD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

TDEC vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither TDEC nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TDEC and BUFD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDEC has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to BUFD (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs BUFD's -10.75%.

On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 22.62% vs 14.62% for BUFD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BUFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 22.62% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDEC and BUFD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

TDEC and BUFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BUFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDEC and BUFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer