TDAQ vs. LQTI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).

TDAQ and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TDAQ is an actively managed fund by TappAlpha. It was launched on Sep 4, 2025. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.

Performance

TDAQ vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TDAQ vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF	-5.75%	8.90%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.52%	1.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.52% return.

TDAQ

• 1D: 3.47%
• 1M: -5.19%
• YTD: -5.75%
• 6M: -2.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 4.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAQ vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

TDAQ

TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

Return for Risk

TDAQ vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 40
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAQ vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDAQ	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.89	-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between TDAQ and LQTI is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TDAQ vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, which matches LQTI's 9.45% yield.

	TTM	2025
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF	9.40%	4.32%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.45%	7.01%

Drawdowns

TDAQ vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDAQ	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-3.41%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.23%	-2.11%	-6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-0.78%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TDAQ	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.55%	6.23%	+11.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.55%	6.12%	+11.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.55%	6.12%	+11.43%