TDAQ vs. AMLP
TDAQ (TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDAQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by TappAlpha, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. TDAQ is actively managed, while AMLP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. TDAQ charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDAQ achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 19.32% return.
TDAQ
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 13.51% | 9.61% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 19.32% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDAQ and AMLP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | -0.18 |
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDAQ
AMLP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Communication Services
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Healthcare
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Industrials
TDAQ
AMLP
Utilities
TDAQ
AMLP
Basic Materials
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Energy
TDAQ
AMLP
Financial Services
TDAQ
AMLP
Real Estate
TDAQ
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDAQ vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
TDAQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMLP
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDAQ | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDAQ drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAQ and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDAQ | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -77.19% | +65.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -1.62% | -4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -17.31% | +14.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDAQ | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 12.59% | +6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 19.68% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 27.64% | -8.76% |
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDAQ has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDAQ vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
TDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than AMLP's 7.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.45% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 13.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDAQ and AMLP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDAQ is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDAQ is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
TDAQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 7.45% for AMLP.
TDAQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TDAQ and 0.90% for AMLP.
Find the right allocation for TDAQ and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer